Governance & Proposals
Master the art of decentralized decision-making through proposals, voting, and execution.
What is DAO Governance?
Governance is how your DAO makes collective decisions. Members propose changes, vote on them, and approved proposals are automatically executed on-chain. This creates transparent, trustless coordination without central authority.
Proposal Types
Treasury Proposals
Fund allocation, grants, spending, and financial operations.
- • Transfer funds to recipients
- • Approve grant applications
- • Investment decisions
- • Emergency fund access
Governance Proposals
Changes to voting rules, quorum, and governance parameters.
- • Modify voting period
- • Update quorum requirements
- • Change approval thresholds
- • Adjust proposal deposits
Tokenomics Proposals
Token supply, rewards, fees, and economic mechanisms.
- • Adjust staking rewards
- • Modify transaction fees
- • Token burning mechanisms
- • Reward distribution rates
Membership Proposals
Add/remove members, assign roles, and manage permissions.
- • Grant admin privileges
- • Remove malicious actors
- • Create new member tiers
- • Modify role permissions
Technical Proposals
Smart contract upgrades, integrations, and technical changes.
- • Upgrade canister code
- • Add new features
- • Fix security vulnerabilities
- • Integrate with protocols
General Proposals
Community decisions, partnerships, and general governance.
- • Community initiatives
- • Partnership approvals
- • Policy decisions
- • Mission/vision updates
Creating a Proposal
Navigate to Governance
Access the governance section from your DAO dashboard.
Dashboard → [Your DAO] → Governance Tab → Click "Create Proposal"
Select Proposal Type
Choose the category that best fits your proposal. This determines voting thresholds.
Each type has different requirements:
- Treasury (66%) - High stakes, needs strong consensus
- Governance (75%) - Changes rules, requires supermajority
- Tokenomics (60%) - Economic changes, moderate threshold
- Membership (51%) - Member management, simple majority
- Technical (66%) - Code changes, high threshold
- General (51%) - Other decisions, simple majority
Write Proposal Details
Craft a clear, compelling proposal that members can understand and evaluate.
Title (Required)
Concise, descriptive title (5-100 characters)
Good: "Increase Staking Rewards by 5%"
Bad: "Important Proposal Please Read"
Description (Required)
Detailed explanation with context and rationale (500+ characters recommended)
Include:
- • Problem: What issue does this address?
- • Solution: How does this proposal solve it?
- • Impact: Who benefits? Any downsides?
- • Implementation: How will this be executed?
- • Timeline: When will changes take effect?
Action Parameters (If Applicable)
For executable proposals, specify the on-chain action:
Example: Transfer 1000 ICP to Principal Recipient: rdmx6-jaaaa-aaaaa-aaadq-cai Amount: 1000 ICP Reason: Community Grant Q1 2025
Pro Tips
- • Use Markdown for formatting (bold, lists, links)
- • Add external links to supporting documents
- • Include budget breakdowns for financial proposals
- • Reference similar past proposals
- • Be transparent about conflicts of interest
Submit Proposal Deposit
Lock tokens as a deposit to prevent spam. Refunded if proposal passes.
Note: Deposit is locked during voting. If proposal fails, deposit goes to treasury.
Review & Submit
Final check before publishing to all members.
Pre-Submit Checklist
- â–¡ Title is clear and specific
- â–¡ Description explains problem, solution, and impact
- â–¡ Action parameters are correct (if executable)
- â–¡ Proposal type and category are appropriate
- â–¡ Deposit amount available in wallet
- â–¡ Reviewed for typos and clarity
Voting begins immediately and lasts for the configured period (typically 5-7 days)
Voting on Proposals
How Voting Power Works
Your voting power is determined by your staked tokens with time-weighted multipliers:
Voting Power = Staked Tokens × Time Multiplier Time Multipliers: • No lock: 1.0x (can unstake anytime) • 3 months: 1.2x (20% bonus) • 6 months: 1.5x (50% bonus) • 1 year: 2.0x (100% bonus) • 2 years: 3.0x (200% bonus)
Vote Yes
Support the proposal. Your voting power counts toward approval.
Vote No
Oppose the proposal. Your voting power counts against approval.
Abstain
Count toward quorum but don't affect outcome. Used when conflicted.
Proposal Lifecycle
Submission
Proposal created, deposit locked, voting begins immediately
Active Voting
Members cast votes, discussion happens, creator can cancel proposal
Voting Ends
Time expires, final tally calculated, outcome determined
Execution (If Passed)
Automatic on-chain execution after optional time-delay, deposit refunded
Archived
Proposal moved to history, outcome recorded permanently on-chain
Best Practices
For Proposal Creators
- • Discuss proposals informally before submitting
- • Provide clear rationale and data
- • Respond to community feedback
- • Split complex proposals into smaller ones
- • Set realistic timelines for implementation
For Voters
- • Read proposals thoroughly before voting
- • Consider long-term impact on DAO
- • Participate in discussions
- • Vote on every proposal (quorum matters)
- • Use abstain when you lack expertise
Learn More
Explore related topics to deepen your understanding of DAO governance.